Zeal wrote:
You were using your claim as knowing how to program as a backing of "It's so easy!" So yes. If you want that to be a valid point, you'll need to back that experience to show that you know what the heck you're talking about. .
Zeal wrote:
So.. statement. So it's just a rant? You do realize you're on a developement forum... right? you do know that... right? .
It is a statement after endless waiting, as I pointed to other games who did put the game up right and produced the version that is released and works and has a good roadmap in time.
and I did not post on the dev point in the forum, I put it on general post to state it has no progress.
perhaps if you deepen yourself in the many indie games that stopped before it was completed, and ran with the money, then you would understand that there is a real concern in any indie game developing so slow. check out the reviews of the game, and find how many buyers think it is never going to finish and are stating it more hash then I do.
so my view on it, is clear. you can of course think of it what you want

.
Zeal wrote:
Now you're just making threats and blackmailing rather than contributing
I am not blackmailing, I want nothing from anyone, I am just stating that my experience in the forum, that resulted in my actions to post reviews, I really, really, (really not) had no intentions of it at all, I just came in to claim the progress was going nowhere.
Zeal wrote:
Not facts... personal belief... You cannot even begin to relay your points if you can't get those two definitions straight.
as I stated in my message, statement : (except for the year end thing, that is my prediction). so you didn't read that very well, and seems that I got my definition and reading right, and you didn't.
but let us not make it a contest, just know the last of the statement was a prediction from my side, as my expectations are somewhat "tempered" on the game future.
I just stated facts, havoc, third party, driver seat, passenger seat. simple facts.
what I am not is patient to wait until my grandkids can play the game that I bought when I was young.
Zeal wrote:
The purpose is to aid in developement. Not just tell everyone that the game is a failure when it hasn't even been released yet
I am a customer, not an aid worker for development studios, if the alpha was for free, sure you have a case, but that goes away when the company charges the customer for something, then product happiness and expectations come in play.
Zeal wrote:
The bad language was taken care of. Banning people on a whim for saying a no-no word is a very poor choice. There are a lot of people who have contributed very heavily to the developement of this game that banning rather than filtering would only serve to damage it's developement. It was not appropriate for them to do so, no, and they shouldn't be doing it in the future, and i'm sure that if they continued to do it on a regular basis, they would indeed be banned. I'm not a moderator though, so i shouldn't really be putting words in their mouths.
So in your logic it means, if you help develop, you get a green card for bashing people on the forum?
And yes the issue has been resolved, i am not stating that it is not.
Zeal wrote:
The bottom line is, you posted an opinion, and other people disagreed with it. You weren't happy that they were disagreeing with you, so you started calling them out on that, saying you were free to your opinions but they were not. That is where the issue spirals out of control of self-rightiousness and hypocracy.
(it is righteousness and hypocrisy by the way, free spelling education

)
I posted a statement, if you like it or not, it is a statement. As I belief these sounds off unhappy customers need to be heard as well.
Hence my tip to make a separate topic for criticism or unhappy customers, it is feedback after all, even if some think it is all negative.
Hearing every day how great it is , is not going to help a lot, criticism can actually help in a positive way.
Zeal wrote:
I hope your reviews are better written and make more sense than your arguments you've presented, because if they aren't, well.. good luck with them then.
My reviews are great, you should read them, at least my spelling level exceeds yours

(Literally and development it is spelled, you seem to get them wrong in the whole rambling post)
But again, I am not here to make spelling lessons, I made a statement.
I stated simply, progress very slow, issues with bugs and havoc is that lo fi is not in the driver seat for the havoc bugs, and depending on 3rd party to solve it, these are facts.
the final part of my statement was that I belief it will be another indie money grab machine, it is an opinion, not a fact.
No I am really closing this thread, I just couldn't resist to reply to Zeal his rambling